01 · Symptoms
Start with what actually failed
Capture the behavior that triggered the investigation without assuming the cause too early.
Aki Inu Tech Case Library
Aki Inu Tech cases preserve the investigation behind technical problems: the symptoms, evidence, decisions, resolution, and verification. Tutorials teach the reusable method. Cases show that method under real troubleshooting pressure.
A good case is not a victory lap after the fix. It records the reasoning that made the fix defensible and reusable.
01 · Symptoms
Capture the behavior that triggered the investigation without assuming the cause too early.
02 · Evidence
Permissions, configuration, logs, traces, identity, networking, health signals, and user context narrow the problem.
03 · Resolution
The useful part is knowing why the selected change addressed the evidence better than the alternatives.
04 · Verification
Re-test the original scenario and document what confirmed the issue was actually resolved.
The public library stays intentionally small while each record is reviewed for technical accuracy, reusable value, and public-safe context.
KT-000001 · Microsoft 365
An investigation of a mailbox that did not appear in Outlook after access had already been assigned.
Read the CaseKT-000002 · Exchange Online
An investigation that separates correct archive configuration from proof of active MRM processing.
Read the CaseKT-000003 · VPN / File Access
A public-safe investigation that treats tunnel success as one checkpoint, then follows the downstream destination, identity, resource path, and mapping evidence.
Read the CaseKT-000004 · SharePoint / OneDrive
A public-safe case showing how browser access isolated a conflicting OneDrive shortcut from the intended SharePoint library sync.
Read the CaseKT-000005 · File Server / Permissions
A public-safe case showing how broad inherited NTFS access was isolated from the SMB share, replaced safely, and verified for both approved and unapproved users.
Read the CaseKT-000006 · Security First Response
A public-safe case separating true-positive classification and completed mitigation from the execution and residual-activity questions that still required verification.
Read the CaseKT-000007 · Workstation Decisions
A public-safe case showing how temporary improvement, persistent saturation, rapid recurrence, and repair history supported a replacement recommendation.
Read the CaseKT-000008 · Identity / Authentication
A public-safe case showing how hosted and cloud identity boundaries were tested separately before credential state was normalized and verified.
Read the CaseKT-000009 · Microsoft 365 / Outlook
A public-safe case showing how exact-time message trace cleared Exchange transport and moved the investigation downstream to the Outlook client path.
Read the CaseKT-000010 · Printers / MFP
A public-safe case showing why network response and a Windows test page proved only part of the path before the actual PDF application workflow was verified.
Read the CaseKT-000011 · Windows / Office
A public-safe case showing how persistent crash evidence narrowed broad remediation to one compatible, known-good Office component and verified the real Outlook workflow.
Read the CaseKT-000012 · Infrastructure / Lifecycle
A public-safe case showing how tactical pressure reduction exposed a longer-term capacity and modernization decision without claiming the transition was completed.
Read the CaseKT-000013 · Infrastructure / Server Triage
A public-safe case showing how event timing separated recurring unplanned shutdowns from maintenance without claiming the underlying power, hypervisor, or hardware cause.
Read the CaseKT-000014 · Application Lifecycle
A public-safe case showing how data protection, vendor-guided sequencing, integrity checks, and real workflow testing turned an installer task into a controlled lifecycle change.
Read the CaseKT-000015 · Mail Flow & Security
A public-safe case showing why original delivery and forwarded authentication must be compared at the security layer that actually rejects the message.
Read the CaseKT-000016 · Microsoft 365 Identity & Offboarding
A public-safe case showing how access removal, business continuity, licensing, and separately controlled endpoint handling depended on deliberate sequencing.
Read the CaseKT-000017 · Identity / SharePoint Access
A public-safe case showing why correct SharePoint authorization did not prove the user's authentication and MFA path was healthy.
Read the CaseKT-000018 · Windows User Profile Recovery
A public-safe case showing why the affected SID, LocalPath, and ProfileImagePath were proven before removing only the verified profile registration.
Read the CaseKT-000019 · Remote Session / Camera & Audio
A public-safe case showing why local hardware, Windows, remote-session redirection, and the conferencing application were tested as separate layers.
Read the CaseKT-000020 · DNS & Infrastructure Troubleshooting
A public-safe case showing how inside-versus-outside comparison isolated internal DNS after filtering visibility and whitelisting did not explain the failure.
Read the CaseKT-000021 · Endpoint Security & Recovery
A public-safe case showing why device identity, authorization, approved escrow sources, protected delivery, and successful boot must all be verified.
Read the CaseKT-000022 · Endpoint Hardware Isolation
A public-safe case showing how changing display, keyboard, and mouse failures shifted the investigation toward their shared hardware path without claiming one exact failed component.
Read the CaseKT-000023 · WAN / ISP / Remote Access
A public-safe case showing how continuous monitoring, LAN/WAN comparison, carrier escalation, and post-repair retesting separated changing network fault domains.
Read the CaseKT-000024 · Endpoint Management / Vendor Escalation
A public-safe case showing how healthy business workloads, installer logs, and vendor confirmation isolated one RMM compatibility defect without destabilizing the endpoint.
Read the CaseKT-000025 · Endpoint Repair & Data Custody
A public-safe case showing how continuity, sync disconnection, cached-data verification, custody transfer, and controlled rebuild protected business data during external repair.
Read the CaseKT-000026 · Windows / Cloud Sync / Application Persistence
A public-safe case showing how a healthy printer, recurring prompt, synced content, and local residue identified the source that could recreate a removed component.
Read the CaseKT-000027 · Security Investigation / Microsoft 365
A public-safe case showing how mail, sharing, identity, and endpoint evidence were separated before correlation, targeted controls, and an explicitly unconfirmed compromise outcome.
Read the CaseKT-000028 · Microsoft 365 / SaaS Licensing
A public-safe case showing why recipient selection, in-app access, assigned seats, required seats, subscription quantity, and billing cleanup need separate proof.
Read the CaseKT-000029 · Workstation Reliability / Hardware Escalation
A public-safe case showing how recurrence across meeting applications after a clean re-image shifted the next test from repeated software work to qualified hardware escalation.
Read the CaseKT-000030 · Microsoft 365 / SharePoint / Security Architecture
A public-safe case showing how business risk, identity, traceability, recipient workflow, policy, testing, and cleanup shaped a controlled external-sharing process.
Read the CaseKT-000031 · Microsoft 365 / Entra / Application Consent
A public-safe case showing how app identity, requested scopes, tenant policy, administrator review, least-necessary approval, and testing controlled a third-party integration.
Read the CaseKT-000032 · Evidence Handling / Application Dependencies
A public-safe case showing how source preservation, format identification, viewer and dependency evidence, and endpoint comparison isolated a proprietary playback chain.
Read the CaseKT-000033 · Windows / Endpoint Management / Configuration Residue
A public-safe case showing how effective-state evidence and one targeted configuration change reopened a required Microsoft Store workflow.
Read the CaseRelated tutorial
The paired tutorial turns the reusable checks from the case into a direct troubleshooting method.
Open the TutorialPublic-safe by design
Cases are rewritten around the technical problem so customer names, ticket exports, credentials, logs, and identifying details stay out of the public record.
The tutorial gives you the method. The case gives you the judgment.
Start with Tutorials when you need a repeatable path. Use Cases when you want to see how evidence, uncertainty, and verification shaped the troubleshooting decision.